Designing a Vendor Management Experience for Clinical Trials (AWS × Johnson & Johnson)

Manage Clinical Trials Studies and Vendor Selection

An AWS Project

#B2B #enterprise #datascience #SaaS

(Note: The branding of the design assets and some of its product features has been changed to protect the confidentiality.)

Project Scope: Enterprise Analytics & AI-Driven Insights

Role: Lead UX Designer

Timeline: Dec 2025 – Feb 2026 (3 Months)

Core Tools: Figma, Qiro (LLM Data Synthesis), Lovable, Jira

Key Impact: Accelerated stakeholder decision-making efficiency by 30%

Deliverables: End-to-End UX Architecture, Journey Maps, Interactive Prototypes, Design Systems (WCAG 2.1)


Project Context

This was not a traditional product build—it was a high-stakes, time-constrained proposal project.
The goal was to demonstrate how AWS could solve operational inefficiencies in clinical trial workflows through a strong UX vision and prototype.


Problem Statement

Data Acquisition Experts lacked an efficient way to identify, evaluate, and assign vendors to clinical studies.

The existing process was:

  • Manual and fragmented

  • Time-consuming

  • Prone to delays and inefficiencies

This directly impacted:

  • Clinical trial timelines

  • Operational costs

  • Decision-making speed


Goal

Design an experience that:

  • Streamlines vendor selection and management

  • Enables faster, insight-driven decision-making

  • Improves visibility into study data and anomalies

  • Reduces turnaround time for critical actions


Target Audience

Primary Users:

  • Data Acquisition Experts (DAEs) at Johnson & Johnson

These users are responsible for:

  • Managing clinical study data

  • Coordinating with vendors

  • Responding to urgent data issues


Constraints

This project required fast, high-impact decision-making under real-world limitations:

  • 3-month timeline

  • No direct access to end users

  • Reliance on SME knowledge

  • Predefined technical ecosystem (AWS)

  • Complex clinical domain


SME-Driven Discovery

Due to time constraints, we relied heavily on Subject Matter Experts (SMEs).

  • Conducted collaborative discussions to understand workflows

  • Asked targeted questions to uncover edge cases and constraints

  • Continuously validated assumptions with stakeholders

Some challenges in this project

Some challenges in this project

Stock photo for Kick Off Meeting

Photo by Product School on Unsplash

Project Kickoff

During the initial AWS-led kickoff:

  • Cross-functional teams aligned on scope and expectations

  • On-site and remote collaboration (I joined remotely from the West Coast)

My contributions:

  • Asked clarifying questions around workflows and dependencies

  • Proposed creating user flow diagrams to simplify complex processes

  • Pushed for shared understanding early to reduce ambiguity later.

Journey Mapping for DAE

Journey Mapping


To better understand the ecosystem, we created a DAE journey map that outlined:

  • How DAEs interact with vendors

  • Key workflow stages in clinical trials

  • Pain points in vendor coordination

  • Opportunities to reduce friction and improve responsiveness

This exercise helped identify:

  • Bottlenecks in vendor assignment

  • Lack of centralized visibility

  • Delays caused by fragmented communication

UI Screens were created for these 4 features

Research participant comments on

current usability of systems

Design & Prototyping


Design System

To move quickly and ensure scalability, we leveraged the
AWS Cloudscape Design System:

  • Ensured consistency and faster implementation

  • Reduced design decision overhead

Visual choices:

  • Font: Open Sans

  • Accent color: Red (aligned with Johnson & Johnson branding)


Wireframing

  • Created low-fidelity wireframes early in the process

  • Focused on layout, hierarchy, and workflow clarity

  • Shared frequently with stakeholders for early feedback

To ensure alignment:

  • Conducted weekly design reviews

  • Iterated based on feedback and evolving requirements


Interactive Prototyping

  • Developed high-fidelity interactive prototypes in Figma

  • Shared prototypes via email for stakeholder review

  • Provided clear instructions for commenting and feedback

This enabled:

  • Asynchronous collaboration

  • Faster iteration cycles

  • Stronger stakeholder engagement


Selected screens for Portfolio showcase

Design thinking diagram

by Nielsen Norman Group

Results & Impact

  • The prototype was very well received by stakeholders at Johnson & Johnson

  • It was perceived as a fully functional product, not just a concept

  • AWS gained confidence in the proposed solution

  • The project progressed into further development and testing phases


Challenges & Future Considerations


Challenges:

1. Domain Complexity

  • Clinical trial workflows are highly specialized, required rapid learning and continuous validation

2. Limited User Access

  • No direct interaction with end users, so relied on SMEs and secondary research

3. Scope & Scale

  • Multiple interconnected workflows and large number of screens and edge cases


Future Improvements:

If given more time, I would:

  • Conduct usability testing with real DAEs

  • Validate data prioritization and workflows

  • Explore edge cases (alerts, overload scenarios)

  • Introduce micro-interactions for better feedback and usability

DetailsTeam :


Director, Product Management and team;


Director, Software Engineering and team;


My Role : Product Designer, Designs were reviewed by my manager - Lead UX;


Timeline : 6+ months

Thank you for stopping by!

Made with ❤️ | Powered by ☕️

© Rishika Dall 2026

Thank you for stopping by!

Made with ❤️ | Powered by ☕️

© Rishika Dall 2026

Thank you for stopping by!

Made with ❤️ | Powered by ☕️

© Rishika Dall 2026